Right now I am singing that George Michael track.
Right now I am singing that George Michael track.
I know by now we have exhausted the watermark debate, but, FTR I am not digging that watermark.
I do think, there has to be a guide in how to apply and add a watermark without losing aesthetical value of the photograph — I think this was the crux of the debate previously.
Alas, too each his own.
noted ma nigga
and i cant find the one without the watermark.
just for noters. why dont you digg this watermark?
*ps: you don't have to change it, just my thoughts.
It distracts, from the photograph — e.g; on this 'graph you can't see how the foot and the grass on the bottom-right corner are composed; which in turn means, i am not able to decide if the entire shot works or not.
So, all I am saying is a watermark, should be a watermark — to mark a photograph, but not steal the show, or hide the show.
but, all in good time: think of it as a branding project — eventually watermarks are perfected.
Alas, I don't use them.
Ahhaaa *two thumbs up*